Are you replaceable?Alex Iskold asks Are YOU Replaceable? He says what I’ve been thinking for a couple of years now. The idea that everyone is replaceable just isn’t the case anymore. Sure some people are but for small growing companies, I’d argue the Top 15-25% simply aren’t replaceable without a serious hit to the organization.

Things get really scary when it comes to visionaries and leaders. Alex says it well:

Losing leaders and visionaries is very, very costly. The knowledge, the vision, and the game plan that was in his head is unique and can not be replicated.

What’s interesting is that few if any startups consider this during their hiring strategy. Sure everyone wants to recruit the best talent, usually you’re going to toss in some options to keep the person engaged but then what? Our industry is very cyclic. Right now we’re (ok I’m) seeing some interesting stratification of talent happening. The Top 10% (aka the freakishly good) are now able to command above market rates - significantly above market rates. As the market heats up people really do seem to be willing to cherry pick and to pay for that privilege.

Recently I’ve had a couple of opportunities float by. In both cases the compensation for the year outstripped what I was currently making and the potential upside that I as a non-founder of a startup could expect over the life of a startup. Holy crap.

I can tell you that the super-sized packages make for interesting over coffee discussions but it makes trouble for the startups themselves. It also makes trouble for the person themselves because once $200k becomes the new $100k and then $250k, etc… it’s really hard to roll back to last year’s lifestyle.

I’m taking this as a wake-up call personally. Now more then ever companies really need to consider their retention policies. Clearly retention doesn’t just include raw compensation but the market does dictates rates. So take a look at your team, segment your talent and figure out a plan to keep your Top X% happy and engaged before it’s too late.